BEHRINGER MX9000 VS BEHRINGER MX8000 PLUS
The B suffix means they have the MRP faders and they changed the labels of one of the auxes from "Phono" to "Aux1" or something like that plus changes in the graphics or color scheme. You can see that the xlr input is on a small seperate board that looks like it could be changed out very easily. Mine doesn't either, I could see most of ch 20 after removing the power supply cover. IC based boards usually have alot lower wattage. The simplest way to see if it has transformers is to check the PSU wattage. Some of the older, early 80's lates 70's RAMSA's had Transformers like the Yamaha PM1000's and every other console of that era. You'll have to let it go for maybe €300 or so? isn't that typically Berrie.Invisible Member wrote on Fri, 24 February 2006 13:45 + i bet, that if u buy the 9000 today and wanna sell it NEXT year I'm never buying behringer again, they got lots of stuff that works,īut thats it, i prefer stuff that works AND is reliable, More than OK, cause they put two awesome engineers on itīut it sucks if you're affraid to touch the EQ !!! then why did they put it on the console? I know bands that used this machine for two songs, and it sounds OK, If you don't have lots of money, then yeah, its a nice mixer, What does that mean to me? if they can't even print proper schematics that are 100% reliable.then whats up with all the electronics inside?
While it only has double bussing (or did they hide that extra bus somewhere on the bottom of the console?) Its so nice cause its got all these options !īut thats it in my opinion, options, nice routing of the signal ,īut even, take a look in the manual, follow the schematics,Īnd you'll see that in those schematics are a few mistakes !!!!Ī few 'lines' are missing and you can 'read' that its got triple bussing, I used it a few times for big mixdowns (24 tracks is big for me)
Gimme a break!Ĥth, the unit comes up weak as a FOH'ists board as was evidenced during a concert featuring jazz-git'ist,Eric Gale where he constantly complained to the soundman after each song about improper gain & tone levels and an apparent "buzzing sound" that accompanied each solo'd passage he performed on acoustic.įrom a former (and NEVER AGAIN) Behringer MX mixer owner. In addition, the unit uses some kind of ULN circuitry (prob'ly named after it 's owner Uli Behringer but s'posed to mean Ultra Low Noise) that puports to be far superior than what is found in most boards in it's range. This creates the unwanted noise in the circuit paths (specifically the channels NOISE being the #1 complaint from Beh mixer owners) along with contributing to unit breakdown( from my OWN personal experience. Unfortunately, using the mid-band sweeps to either boost/cut a freq'y simultaneously renders the 15db pad attenuater useless as loss of gain will be noticeable when sweeps are put in use (via a demonstration the defunct Apple Studios in NYC).ģrd, The 9000's power transformer produces a hi-level of heat with very little
BEHRINGER MX9000 VS BEHRINGER MX8000 PRO
ProRec's resident pro B.Park, also concluded that the 9000's pre's were wholly inadequate for hi-quality mic use.Ģnd, the 9000's boasts a 4-band eq with 2-semi-para mid bands. The MX9000 is a horribly constructed mixer built entirely of 3rd grade components.ġst, the 9000 incorporates below-par pre's supposedly measured with an input sensitivity rating of 22+dbu's.However, an actual test perf'md by a longtime & well-respected member here a while back using hi-sense condensors on a drum-kit,measured a mere 16+dbu's.
0 kommentar(er)
